![]() [FILE] Participants in the Mardin conference in Turkey. |
Following the "waves of revisions" in recent years by Islamic groups condoning violence as a means for achieving their aims, and their acknowledgement of the fact that they were wrong, a number of Islamic scholars and thinkers gathered to discuss one of the new concepts used by al-Qaeda and other organisations with similar ideological leanings in order to justify acts of violence that target Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
The concept sees the world as divided into "Dar Salam" (Abode of Peace) and "Dar Harb" (Abode of War).
The scholars and thinkers gathered at a conference in Mardin in southeastern Turkey on March 27th-28th to discuss the fatwa, or legal verdict, of Ibn Taymiyyah (who died in 1328 A.D.) regarding that city in particular, which he described as a "Mixed Abode" since it has the characteristics of both the "Abode of Peace" and the "Abode of War". They reached the fundamental conclusion that this traditional Islamic categorisation of the world should be reviewed because today's world cannot be divided along those lines.
The participants at the Mardin conference came from different Arab and Islamic countries (including Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Bosnia, Iran, Indonesia, India, Morocco, Kuwait and Senegal). They pointed out that the fatwa of Ibn Taymiyyah took into account a new political situation which surfaced at that time --the Tatar's invasion of the Islamic world-- which prompted him to categorise Mardin as a "Mixed Abode", a categorisation that was previously nonexistent among scholars before him.
In their declaration, the scholars added that "the point taken into account by Ibn Taymiyyah in his fatwa" requires that contemporary jurists review the division of the world into the two abodes of war and peace", because of the different situation today where Muslims are part of international treaties that guarantee peace and security for all, so that they feel secure regarding their possessions, their persons and their countries.
"Based on this situation, Muslims have mixed together with non-Muslims in an unprecedented manner, in the political, social and economic aspects. Also, reviewing this categorisation is necessary because Muslims are in need of a sound Islamic view that does not contradict Islamic texts, is compatible with the general principles of Islam and is suited to the contemporary situation."
Perhaps it would be worthwhile to summarize the main points that came out of the Mardin conference:
- Ibn Taymiyyah's fatwa regarding Mardin "cannot, under any circumstances, be used as a justification and proof for excommunicating Muslims and taking up arms against their rulers, and shedding their blood and taking their property, and terrorizing peaceful people, and betraying those living among Muslims and those whom Muslims live in their midst by virtue of citizenship and security. Whoever takes this fatwa as an excuse to fight Muslims and non-Muslims has erred in their interpretation and are wrong according to the scriptural texts."
- "The categorisation of territories in Islamic jurisprudence is an interpretation that was formulated because of circumstances in the Islamic community and the nature of international relations at the time. However, the fact that circumstances are different today, and because of the existence of recognised international treaties and the illegal nature of wars that are not waged in response to repelling an aggressor or resisting an occupation, and the emergence of the nation-state which guarantees freedom of religion and protects minorities and secures the rights of its citizens, all of this has turned the whole world into a place for tolerance and peaceful co-existence among all religions and sectarian groups in order to achieve the mutual interests of people and establish justice."
- "Among the top priorities of the scholars of the Islamic community and its academic institutions is to analyze the ideological justifications for extremism, excommunication and violence in the name of Islam, and correct those ideas."
- "The scholars of Islam have constantly affirmed throughout the centuries that Jihad, which is considered the pinnacle of Islam, is not only of one kind. Instead, there are different kinds of Jihad, among which is the fight in the way of God. The Islamic religion has restricted the exercise of this kind of Jihad and its planning and execution to those vested with authority (the state), as it is a political decision which has great implications. It is thus not permissible for a Muslim individual or group to declare war or engage in physical Jihad on their own."
- "The question of issuing a fatwa in Islam is a serious matter, which is why scholars have put strict conditions for a Mufti, among which is that he should be academically well-qualified."
According to the announcement for the Mardin conference, many scholars and thinkers from a number of countries participated in the conference, including the Mufti of Bosnia, Dr. Mustafa Ceric, the Mauritanian scholar Sheikh Abdullah bin Bayah (Global Centre for Renewal and Guidance), Dr. Abdullah Omar Nasseef (Chairman of the Board of Trustees at the Centre), Sheikh Habib Ali Al-Jifri from Yemen (Founder and Director of Taba Institute, UAE), Ahmad Abidi Arani (Iranian professor of Philosophy and Hadith), Dr. Abdul Wahhab Al-Nasir Al-Turayri (assistant supervisor of the Islam Today organization, KSA) and judge Sheikh Abdullah Ould Ali Salem (president of the Supreme Constitutional Council of Mauritania).
The recommendations of the scholars and thinkers show that they were attempting to "open a breach" in a historical wall which Islamic scholars in the past until today have used, which is the division of the world into "Dar Salam" (where Muslims live in peace and practise their religion) and "Dar Harb" (where the "non-believers" live).
They said that this division was an interpretation by past scholars and is incompatible with the circumstances of the world today, as Muslims live in relatively large minorities in many European and Western countries, which could be designated as "Dar Harb" according to the old classification.
Moreover, as pointed out by Libyan professor Aref Ali Nayed (Director of the Kalam Research and Media Centre, Dubai), many Muslims have taken refuge in the West –which is supposed to be a "Dar Harb", according to some Jihadis today-- where they are able to practise their religion more freely than in their home countries, which are assumed to be within the "Dar Salam" category, since they are Islamic countries.
Undoubtedly, addressing this issue specifically is of paramount importance because of anti-West campaigns launched in some Islamic countries, particularly claiming that Muslims are being persecuted by "non-believers". Proponents of these campaigns refer to some of the measures taken against Islamist activists in the context of the war on terror in addition to measures being taken by some countries to ban the veil or promote writings and caricatures that are anti-Islamic. However, they completely ignore the fact that Muslims enjoy the same rights that people of all other religions enjoy under the laws of their respective countries.
Perhaps the need to clear up this matter was the main reason that prompted the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office to invite a number of Afghan religious clerics to visit the United Kingdom and to appraise the situation of Muslims there. Members of the visiting delegation said that the visit has proven the false claims of the campaigns launched by hardliners in Afghanistan about the persecution of Muslims in the UK. The British authorities organised a tour of various mosques and Islamic centres for the delegation, especially in the city of Birmingham, the second-largest city in the UK which is home to a large Muslim community.
The declaration of "Mardin, the Abode of Peace" also tackled another important issue: determining who is qualified to issue fatwas legitimising physical jihad. Participants said that this matter should be the exclusive right of the state and not a group or an individual, which is a direct reference to al-Qaeda and its various branches in the Islamic countries, where acts of violence are committed and described as "jihad" by those engaging in such acts, while the governments and many others consider them as "terrorism".
The Mardin declaration follows a series of initiatives by Islamic entities attempting to counter the ideologies promoted by al-Qaeda in particular. The Pakistani scholar, Sheikh Tahir ul-Qadri, issued a 600-page fatwa last month in London in which he condemned the "terrorism practised by al-Qaeda", and said individuals engaging in suicide bombings are not real Jihadists, and they will be punished for their acts in the hereafter.
Similarly, leaders of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) issued major revisions last summer, condemning many practices that perpetrators call "jihad" – including their own activities against the Libyan government in the 1990s. The Libyan authorities released dozens of members of the LIFG from jail last month.
Other scholars and activists adopted the same stance, such as that taken by the imprisoned Moroccan sheikh, Mohammed Al-Fizazi, condemning the threats by al-Qaeda to carry out bombings in Europe. Others have issued direct condemnations, such as the revisions by Jihadi theoretician Dr. Fadl, of the acts of Osama Bin Laden, the leader of al-Qaeda and his deputy, Dr. Ayman Al-Zawahiri and considered their activities to be blatantly opposed to the Islamic religion.
Undoubtedly, the new stance of scholars and thinkers in Mardin will not cause al-Qaeda and its supporters to abandon their activities and their ideologies that consider the governments in the Arab world as apostate regimes, which then legitimises bombings and acts of violence in order to change these regimes. However, the declaration of "Mardin, the Abode of Peace" could be a new starting point in an ocean of "revisions" targeting the new generations of youths who are eager to engage in Jihad, before they are pulled away by al-Qaeda and its sister organisations.
The dominant perspective in most countries, especially the European ones, is that the Islamic religion is a religion of murder, terrorism and bloodshed, which is a very wrong notion. This perspective came from the malicious and despicable acts committed by the terrorist al-Qaeda organization, at the head of which are the criminals, Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri. May God curse them until the Day of Judgment.
The government should play an active and strong role in laying the proper foundation for holding such conferences, and it should follow up on them with all the elements of their success, so that they might achieve the objective for which they were held, which is to confront terrorism and the ideology that it embraces, and to explain its true nature and the extent of its danger, should it spread in society. All of this is for the sake of protecting society, and raising awareness among the people, so that they are not influenced by the perverted terrorist ideology, and in order to preserve the unity of the Iraqi people and avert the danger of a civil war befalling Iraq and the Iraqis, and to stand in the way of terrorists and all their attempts at realizing this.
Men of Religion played a major role to stop many persons from joining terrorists. Terrorists used to deceive persons, talk to them in the name of religion or the welfare of the country. However, people have revealed their lies. Iraqi police forces as well played a significant role as they did their utmost to punish these criminal murderers.
I agree that Islamic ideology is peaceful and constructive. It is based upon fairness and equality among human beings. Islam doesn’t discriminate between religions, races, colors or genders. Islam incites everybody to behave properly and to maintain the right path. Islam urges people to appeal to court to solve disagreements, and it rejects any kind of violence. Islamic ideology also fosters unity and solidarity among the people to serve their country primarily. Islam forbids killing under any circumstance. Murder is rejected by all the heavenly and positive laws. Islam advocates the spread of religious culture so that people will distinguish between right and wrong deeds, in order to maintain the right ones. Islamic ideology is the antithesis of terrorist thought in all its forms. These two ideologies are contradictory, because they have different creeds and orientations.
We believe that religious scholars have played an important role by issuing “fatwas” through their Friday sermons, their religious educational lessons and their appearances in various media to motivate people, guide them and educate them religiously, so that they will not fall prey to terrorists. They clarify their reality and expose their threats to people, to warn them. Thus, religious scholars from different religions and sects have become responsible for fighting terrorist ideology through enlightened thinking, to preserve society from being misled by terrorists, and by issuing “fatwas” banning them from joining terrorist groups, calling for the necessity of reporting on every terrorist, and assisting the security forces in arresting them. This should be considered as a religious duty incumbent on all Iraqis, to preserve Iraqi blood from being shed by terrorists throughout Iraq. Although religious scholars have been the target of terrorists, they have not hesitated to continue their positive role in educating people, sensitizing them and showing them the right path, and they consider it a religious duty incumbent on any person.
The honorable and distinguished scholars have thankfully exposed the intentions and the danger of terrorism, and they have warned the youth against its pernicious ideologies. This has been immensely effective in the fight against terrorists, both on the ideological and religious fronts, and has eradicated terrorism. This has led to terrorism’s loss of its elements, its ideas and its ways of getting the youths to join its ranks, causing the terrorists to become weak and few in number, because now they cannot exert their influence on any young man who has been taught by the religious scholars that the path of terror is not the right path, and that it is forbidden in Islam. The terrorists try to convince the youth and influence them by presenting them with wrong and perverted ideas about the tolerant Islamic faith, turning it into killing and terrorism. The view of every Muslim and every person living on this earth regarding terrorism and its supposed jihad is a negative one, and they do not support it, and they do not wish to see it take place anywhere. They also hope that terrorism will end everywhere. However, there are those who are weak-minded, and those who finance terrorism and provide support to it.
Undoubtedly, we need to hold conferences all over the world and in Islamic countries to rectify thought and to help religion get rid of these rotten persons, of their beliefs and evils. We need to hold conferences in Iraq to bury the hatchet and to rid Iraq of these terrorists and terrorism who have always sought to harm Iraq and its people. These conferences can deeply influence the Iraqis, especially after the civil war which took place in Iraq and killed thousands of innocent people. From 2004 till the end of 2008, Iraq witnessed a dark civil war which claimed the lives of many Iraqi families, the best of the young persons and men. Hospitals used to count at least 500 corpses every day. These corpses were cut into pieces, disfigured, with limbs and heads cut off. This was the result of the civil war which took place in Iraq, mainly in Baghdad. There were many reasons behind this war, particularly religion. Terrorists, in cooperation with the Baath members, took advantage of Iraq’s weakness, which is religious sectarianism in Iraq.
It is important to communicate the results of these conferences held by the clerics to the people through the real, strong and effective media, and to clarify them completely, to abolish terrorism and their followers in terms of the issues of religion that may have been confused by the ordinary citizen and used by terrorists as bait to fish in troubled water and drag the people into their rotten networks. These conferences should be held continuously and periodically to combat any new approach that can be adopted by these criminals. This is because terrorists are not typical, as they often change their tactics and ways to lure people to them, to recruit new members to their terrorist organizations. Therefore, the clerics must pay attention to that, respond to them and their plots, and deliver a clear message to the people confirming the need for a truce between the people, so as not to be dragged behind the plots of criminal murderers. Clerics also must clarify that heavenly religions unequivocally prohibit bloodshed and that such terrorists are the enemies of religion, whom the people must fight and help security forces to arrest. By doing so, we can combat these criminals, and send a clear message to the world and to Iraqis in particular, calling for unity among the clerics of various religions, and explaining that there is no difference between the Iraqi people. The Iraqi citizen is treated on the basis of his national identity, not on the basis of his religion, and this is what will defeat terrorists, as they are trying to convey a poisonous idea to the whole world that Iraq is weak and its people are divided among themselves, each according to his religion and his sect, which undermines the image of Iraqis abroad.
I believe that ignorance is the cause of all disasters in all aspects of life. Al Qaeda is destruction to Islam. Al Qaeda is a shame on Islam as a religion and for the Muslims as well, and is also a shame to all humanity.
Al-Qaeda's regular sources of funding seem to be disappearing after the death of Osama bin Laden an...
Join the discussion
#comment#